China and the US might be signing a first trade deal this month, economist Arthur Kroeber does not see much change. Uncoupling with economies is not possible, he argues, and the trade deal does not deal with the real problems, he tells in The New Yorker.
The New Yorker:
When Trump first imagined “uncoupling”—or “decoupling,” as it became known—the term evoked a divorce. But a complete decoupling is implausible. “Total revenue of U.S. companies and affiliates in China in 2017, for one year, is five hundred and forty-four billion dollars,” Kroeber told me. “What’s the chance these numbers can go down eighty or ninety per cent? Almost no chance. We can remove a few of those tangles, but the cost to the U.S. economy of removing them all would be unacceptably high.”
Some companies—Nintendo, GoPro, Hasbro—have accelerated plans to build factories in places such as India, Vietnam, and Mexico. But most American C.E.O.s want more access to China, not less…
The truce did not resolve the core disputes, such as technology transfer, and, outside the White House, it was mostly seen as the end of a wasteful stunt. “Trump was looking for any possible excuse not to put on the tariffs that he had threatened,” Kroeber said, “so he got a promise from the Chinese to buy soybeans and some other stuff, and he packaged this.”
Are you looking for more experts on the ongoing trade war between China and the US? Do check out this list.